TSTP Solution File: SET200^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SET200^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 09:04:44 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.39s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   7 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  213 (  81 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  236 (  45   ~;  36   |;  32   &; 103   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   36 (  36   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   0   ^  42   !;  22   ?;  64   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK3: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK4: a ).

thf(f33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f25,f28,f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ~ spl5_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl5_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f30,f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( spl5_2
  <=> ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_2])]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
   != $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f12,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X4: a] :
      ( ( ( sK3 @ X4 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ! [X4: a] :
        ( ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( sK3 @ X4 )
          = $true ) )
    & ! [X5: a] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X5 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( sK1 @ X5 )
          = $true ) )
    & ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
     != $true )
    & ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( sK3 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f8,f10,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
              = $true ) )
        & ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( X1 @ X5 )
              = $true ) )
        & ? [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( $true
                = ( X2 @ X6 ) )
              | ( ( X0 @ X6 )
                = $true ) )
            & ( ( X3 @ X6 )
             != $true ) ) )
   => ( ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( sK3 @ X4 )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ X5 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( sK1 @ X5 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( sK1 @ X6 ) )
          & ( ( ( sK2 @ X6 )
              = $true )
            | ( $true
              = ( sK0 @ X6 ) ) )
          & ( ( sK3 @ X6 )
           != $true ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X6: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ X6 ) )
        & ( ( ( sK2 @ X6 )
            = $true )
          | ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X6 ) ) )
        & ( ( sK3 @ X6 )
         != $true ) )
   => ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
       != $true )
      & ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( sK3 @ sK4 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X5 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( $true
              = ( X2 @ X6 ) )
            | ( ( X0 @ X6 )
              = $true ) )
          & ( ( X3 @ X6 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X3: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X2 @ X4 )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true
            = ( X3 @ X5 ) ) )
      & ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( X3 @ X6 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X6 )
              = $true ) )
          & ( $true
           != ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
      ( ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( X3 @ X6 )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
           != ( X2 @ X6 ) )
          & ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X6 )
              = $true ) ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X2 @ X4 )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true
            = ( X3 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                = $true ) )
          & ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                = $true )
             => ( $true
                = ( X3 @ X5 ) ) ) )
       => ! [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
                = $true )
              | ( ( X0 @ X6 )
                = $true ) )
           => ( ( ( X3 @ X6 )
                = $true )
              | ( $true
                = ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X4 )
             => ( X2 @ X4 ) )
          & ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X5 )
             => ( X3 @ X5 ) ) )
       => ! [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X6 )
              | ( X0 @ X6 ) )
           => ( ( X3 @ X6 )
              | ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X4 )
             => ( X1 @ X4 ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X4 )
             => ( X3 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
              | ( X2 @ X4 ) )
           => ( ( X3 @ X4 )
              | ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X2: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           => ( X1 @ X4 ) )
        & ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ X4 )
           => ( X3 @ X4 ) ) )
     => ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
            | ( X2 @ X4 ) )
         => ( ( X3 @ X4 )
            | ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.b4tXAerYQw/Vampire---4.8_7990',cBOOL_PROP_34_pme) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK3 @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ~ spl5_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f27,f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( spl5_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_1])]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f14,f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X5: a] :
      ( ( ( sK1 @ X5 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X5 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( spl5_1
    | spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f22,f18]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem    : SET200^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:39:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.37  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.b4tXAerYQw/Vampire---4.8_7990
% 0.15/0.38  % (8154)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (8157)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (8160)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (8155)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (8159)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (8156)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)Termination phase: Unused predicate definition removal
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (8158)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (8157)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (8161)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (8159)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (8154)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (8153)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.39  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------